DAMPAK KRISIS EKONOMI TERHADAP KINERJA EKONOMI NASIONAL DAN KEMISKINAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30742/equilibrium.v10i1.127Keywords:
economic growth, distribution of revenue, economic crisisAbstract
The purpose of this research was to analyze Indonesian economic performance after global economic crisis in 2008. Beside that, the purpose of this research was to analyze the relationship between global ecomic crisis and poverty. Basic concept of this research used Kuznets’s Theory (1971). This theory explain that at the begining of development process, rate of poverty tend to rise and at the ending of development process, rate of poverty tend to decline. This research used descriptive-quantitative analysis and based on data of Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). Gini Ratio was used as indicator of size discrepency of community’s income. The result of this research indicated that after economic crisis in 1997, Indonesian economic had negative growth 13,24%. Beside that, the size of poverty community had slight increase from 21,5 billion persons in 1996, become 79,4 billion persons in 1998. After economic crisis in 2008, economic growth had decline, even at 2010 economic growth had good condition with growth as 7,1%. Unfortunately, good condition of economic growth did not followed by dissemination of national income. It was proved by Ratio Gini from 0,345 in 2006, become 0,39 in 2010. This indicated that discrepency of economic tend to rise.References
Badan Pusat Statistik, 1998 sampai dengan 2011, Statistik Indonesia, BPS. Indonesia.
............., 2010, Survey Sosial-Ekonomi Nasional, BPS. Indonesia.
............., 2010, Perkembangan Beberapa Indikator Utama Sosial-Ekonomi Indonesia, BPS. Indonesia.
............., 2010, Data Stategis BPS, BPS. Indonesia.
Budiardjo, M. 1985. Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Deininger, K. & Squire, L. 1996. A New data set measuring income inequality. World Bank Economic Review, World Bank Group, vol. 10 (3).
Kuznets S, 1971, Economic Growth of Nation: Total Output and Production Structure. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Mills, E. S. & Pernia, E M. 1993. The Economic Development of Southeast Asia. Hal Hill, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Ravallion & Shaohua Chen. 1997. What can new survey data tell us about recent changes in distributuon and pomerty? Word Bank Economic Review. Washington, DC.
Salim, E. 1978. Tantangan masa depan, pembangunan dengan pemerataan. Prisma, edisi 7, volume 8.
World Bank, 2005, Word Development Indicator, for Recontruction and Development. Washington, DC.
http://kupastuntasmanajemen.blogspot.com/2009/10/perekonomian-indonesia-di-era-reformasi.html
http://metris-community.com/dampak-krisis-ekonomi-global/
http://wartawarga.gunadarma.ac.id/2011/04/sejarah-ekonomi-indonesia-orde-lama-era-reformasi-2/
http://www.depkeu.go.id/ind/Data/Artikel/dampak_perekonomian.htm
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work



