Pengaruh Modal Sosial Terhadap Penggunaan Dompet Digital Dan Penerapan Akuntansi Sebagai Pemoderasi Pada UMKM Di Provinsi DIY

Authors

  • Jonathan Herdioko Fakulas Bisnis Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana Yogyakarta
  • Eka Adhi Wibowo Fakultas Bisinis Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana Yogyakarta
  • Mulya Cahyadi Fakultas Bisnis Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana Yogyakarta
  • Nareswari Nisita Fakultas Bisnis Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30742/equilibrium.v20i2.3926

Keywords:

modal sosial, trust, empati, pengetahuan akuntansi, e wallet

Abstract

Economic activity is an indicator in determining economic performance. Indonesia has a significant number of MSMEs (data), which play an important role in the economy. The MSME sector, which is part of the overall economic activity, is supported not only by financial capital but also by social capital, which includes trust, empathy, cognitive knowledge, social relations, and structural aspects. The significant role of MSMEs requires performance improvement to enhance economic growth and ensure a more equitable impact on society. This performance improvement necessitates the application of good accounting practices in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), supported by financial management technologies such as e-wallets. This study aims to examine the extent to which trust, empathy, cognitive knowledge, social relations, and structural aspects influence the use of digital wallets and the implementation of accounting in MSMEs, specifically in the DIY Province. This research employs quantitative data analysis collected through questionnaires with MSME respondents. The objective of this study is to measure the impact of social capital on the use of digital wallets and the implementation of accounting in MSMEs in the DIY Province.

References

Bank, W. (2011). World Development Report, Conflict, Security, and. World Bank Publications.

Batari, d. (2018). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan dan Citra Merek terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen Mobil Ford. SEIKO: Journal of Management and Business, Vol,2(1).

Batu, w., & Hughes, j. (2002). Modal sosial: Makna empiris dan validitas pengukuran. Melbourne: Institut Studi Keluarga Australia, 27.

Bhandari, Humnath, Yasunobu, & Kumi. (2009). What Is Social Capital? A Comprehenxive Review of the Concept. Asian Journal of Science, 480-510.

Bourdieu, P., & Nice, R. (1980). The production of belief: contribution to an economy of symbolic goods. Media Culture Society, 261-293.

Bungin, & Burhan. (2014). Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.

Burchell, S., Clubb, C., & Hopwood, A. (1985). Akuntansi dalam konteks sosialnya: menuju sejarah nilai tambah di Inggris. Akuntansi, Organisasi dan Masyarakat, 381-413.

Burgess, e. a. (2003). Factors Affecting Adoption of Electronic Commerce Technologies by SMEs: an Australian Study. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10.

Coleman. (1988). Social Capital in the Creaation of Human Capital. The University of Chicago Press, 95-120.

Cooper, D., & Robson, K. (2006). Akuntansi, profesi dan regulasi: menemukan situs profesionalisasi. Akuntansi, Organisasi dan Masyarakat, 415-444.

De Villiers, C., La Torre, M., & Botes, V. (2022). Accounting and social capital: A review and reflections on future research opportunities. Accounting & Finance, 4485-4521.

Dollu, E. S. (2020). Modal Sosial: Studi Tentang Kumpo Kampo sebagai Strategi Melestarikan Kohesivitas Pada Masyarakat Larantuka di Kabupaten Flores Timur. Warta Governare, 1(1), 1.

Fitri Harseno, D. (2021). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penggunaan E-wallet di Indonesia. 1-12.

Fukuyama, F. (2000). Social Capital and Civil Society. IMF Working Paper, 3-17.

Fukuyama, F. (2002). Kebijakan Sosial dan Penciptaan Kemakmuran. Yogyakarta Qalam.

Fukuyama, F. (2005). Güven: Sosyal erdemler ve refahın yaratılması (çev. A. Buğdaycı). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür.

Hamsah. (2017). Modal Sosial dalam Makassar Tidak Rantasa. MIB Indonesia.

Hanifan. (1916). The Rural School Community Center. Sage, 130-138.

Hidayat, H., & Putri, I. F. (2011). Analisis Persepsi Modal Sosial dan hubungannya dengan Eksistensi Kelompok Tani (Kasus pada Kelompok Tani Wanita “Sri Rejeki 2â€, Desa Junrejo, Kecamatan Junrejo, Kota Batu,Malang). Wacana Brawijaya, Vol.14 No.1.

Hines, R. D. (1988). Financial accounting: In communicating reality, we construct reality. Accounting Organizations and Society, XIII(3), 251-261.

Hopwood, A. (1987). Arkeologi sistem akuntansi . Akuntansi, Organisasi dan masyarakat , 207-234.

Hughes, J., & Stone, W. (2002). Laporan Kerja Lapangan Proyek Keluarga, Modal Sosial dan Kewarganegaraan. Institut Studi Keluarga Australia.

Kadiyono, A. L. (2013). Analisis Social Capital Pada Pelaku Agribisnis dalam Mengembangkan Kemampuan Sebagai Enterpreneur. Simposium Kebudayaan Indonesia Malaysia (SKIM) XIII.

Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1972). Organisasi & Manajemen. The Academy of Management Journal.

Kimbal, R. W. (2015). Modal Sosial dan Ekonomi Industri Kecil: Sebuah Studi Kualitatif. Yogyakarta, Deeppublish.

Ling, J., & Catling, J. (2012). Psikologi Kognitif. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Mulyana, A., & Wijaya, H. (2018). Perancangan E-Payment System pada E-Wallet Menggunakan Kode QR Berbasis Android. Komputika, 1-7.

Paxton, P. (1999). Apakah modal sosial menurun di Amerika Serikat?

Penilaian berbagai indikator? Penilaian berbagai indikator. American Journal of Sociology, 88-127.

Portes, A. (1998). Modal sosial: asal usul dan penerapannya dalam sosiologi modern. Tinjauan Tahun Sosiologi , 1-24.

Powe, M. (2015). Bagaimana akuntansi dimulai: pembentukan objek dan pertambahan infrastruktur. Akuntansi, Organisasi dan Masyarakat, 43-55.

Putnam, R. (2001). Social Capital: Measurement and Consequences.

Robson, K. (1991). Di arena perubahan akuntansi: proses penerjemahan . Akuntansi, Organisasi dan Masyarakat, 547-570.

Santoso, S. (2012). Aplikasi SPSS Pada Statistik Parametrik. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

Santoso, T. (2020). Memahami Modal Sosial. Surabaya: Pustaka Saga.

Sholikah, M., & Achadiyah, B. N. (2017). Perlakuan Akuntansi untuk Aset Bersejarah “Candi Rimbi†Jombang. VI no.2 hal .55

Statistik, B. P. (2021). Statistik Modal Sosial. Retrieved from http://www.bps.go.id

Stone, W. (2001). Mengukur Modal Sosial. Insitut Studi Keluarga Australia

.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sundberg, M. (2016). Heritage Perceptions: A Study of Southwest Minneapolis. Thesis,Great Britain.

Toth, Z., Nemkova, E., Gabor, H., & Naude, P. (2022). Social capital creation on professional sharing economy platforms: The problems of rating dependency and the non-transferability of social capital. Journal of Business Research 1, 450-460.

Walker, P. S. (2005). Accounting in History. Accounting Historian Journal, Vol 32 no.2 p 233-259.

Walker, S. (2016). Meninjau kembali peran akuntansi dalam masyarakat . Akuntansi, Organisasi dan Masyarakat, 41-50.

Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (2006). Teori akuntansi positif: perspektif sepuluh tahun . Tinjauan Akuntansi . Tinjauan Akuntansi , 131-156.

Winter, I. (2000). Modal Sosial dan Kebijakan Publik di Australia. Institut Studi Keluarga Australia.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-10-16

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 2 (2024): October

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work