Dari Instruksi Ke Dialog: Analisis Keterlibatan Masyarakat Dalam Wacana Kebijakan Pertanian Di Ruang Digital
Keywords:
Analisis Wacana Kritis, Digital, Kebijakan, Partisipasi, PertanianAbstract
Klaim bahwa transformasi digital mendorong komunikasi kebijakan yang lebih partisipatif diuji melalui
studi kasus di Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara. Penelitian metode campuran ini mengintegrasikan Analisis
Wacana Kritis terhadap wacana resmi pemerintah dengan analisis sentimen dan tematik terhadap 2.845
respons publik di platform digital. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa meskipun keterlibatan publik tinggi, pola
interaksi yang terbentuk tidak menghasilkan dialog kebijakan yang substantif. Wacana resmi didominasi
framing teknokratis, populis, dan kedaulatan pangan, sementara respons publik terpilah dalam kritik
implementasi, apresiasi, saran, dan skeptisisme. Temuan kunci mengungkap kesenjangan antara
engagement yang tinggi dan pengaruh kebijakan yang rendah, di mana ruang digital lebih berfungsi sebagai
sarana legitimasi dan penguatan komunikasi satu arah. Penelitian ini memperkenalkan konsep ‘absorpsi
selektif’ sebagai mekanisme yang menjelaskan mengapa masukan publik teknis-operasional lebih mudah
diserap, sementara kritik struktural diabaikan. Absorpsi selektif adalah mekanisme penyaringan masukan
publik yang memprioritaskan umpan balik teknis-operasional yang selaras dengan narasi pembangunan
pemerintah, dan mengabaikan kritik struktural yang berpotensi mengganggu hierarki dan paradigma
kebijakan yang berlaku. Kontribusi studi terletak pada wacana tata kelola digital dengan menyoroti
dinamika partisipasi di Indonesia Timur.
References
Bächtiger, A., & Parkinson, J. (2019). Mapping and Measuring Deliberation: Towards a
New Deliberative Quality. Oxford University Press.
Beeson, M. (2023). The new techno-populism: Governing through digital
platforms. Policy Studies, 44(2), 145-162.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative
Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
214 (Prosiding Seminar Agrifuture: Integrasi Keberlanjutan dan Inovasi Pertanian)
Bronson, K., & Knezevic, I. (2016). Big Data in food and agriculture. Big Data & Society,
3(1).
Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University
Press.
Clapp, J. (2022). The problem with growing corporate concentration and power in the
global food system. Nature Food, 3(5), 296-303.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods
research. Sage publications.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological
methods. Routledge.
Eastwood, C. R., et al. (2019). Managing 'big data' in agriculture: Opportunities and
challenges. Agricultural Systems, 176, 102646.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language.
Routledge.
Fisher, D. R. (2020). The broader importance of #FridaysForFuture. Nature Climate
Change, 10(10), 895-896.
-----------. (2020). The populist paradox: Interest in technocratic reforms and support for
populist parties. Environmental Politics, 29(5), 903-925.
Freelon, D. (2015). Discourse architecture, ideology, and democratic norms in online
political discussion. New Media & Society, 17(5).
Graham, T., et al. (2015). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with
voters. Information, Communication & Society, 18(4).
Hoffmann, M., Tan, W. K., & Lee, S. Y. (2023). Digital governance and the illusion of
participation: Evidence from Southeast Asia. Journal of Information Technology
& Politics, 20(2), 145-163.
Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E. (2014). VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment
analysis of social media text. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference
on Web and Social Media, 8(1), 216-225.
Johnson, M., & Brown, R. (2024). Blockchain for transparent governance: Applications
in public participation. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 5(1), 1-15.
Kim, J., & Lee, H. (2024). Authoritarian resilience in the digital age: Social media and
political control in Southeast Asia. Democratization, 31(1), 78-96.
Klerkx, L., et al. (2019). A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming,
and agriculture 4.0. Agricultural Systems, 177.
Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal
nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 365-383.
Mettler, S., & SoRelle, M. (2017). Policy feedback theory. In Theories of the policy
process (pp. 151-182). Routledge.
Mergel, I. (2013). Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal
government. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 123-130.
Mitchell, R. (2018). Web scraping with Python: Collecting more data from the modern
web. O'Reilly Media.
Nurfadillah, et al. (2022). Digital participation of farmers in agricultural policy making:
A case study from West Java. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 26(3), 45-58.
215
Schäfer, M. S. (2023). Digital public sphere. In The Routledge Handbook of Environment
and Communication (pp. 215-228). Routledge.
Smith, P. (2023). Deliberative digital governance: Innovations in public
participation. Policy & Internet, 15(3), 345-367.
Svensson, J., Neumayer, C., Banfield-Mumb, A., & Schossboeck, J. (2015). Identity and
anonymity in digital democracy: Comparing the use of different online tools in a
participatory budgeting process. Policy & Internet, 7(3), 287-307.
Taufiqurrahman, M. (2020). Social media and agricultural policy participation in South
Sulawesi. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Studies, 15(2), 112-125.
Thelwall, M. (2017). Sentiment analysis for social media. In The SAGE handbook of
social media research methods (pp. 545-558). Sage.
Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2016). Social media research: A guide to ethics. University
of Aberdeen, 1-16.
Warburton, E., & Aspinall, E. (2019). Explaining Indonesia's Democratic Regression.
Asian Survey, 59(6).
Zhang, H., & Chen, L. (2023). Digital transformation without institutional change: The
paradox of e-government in developing countries. Government Information
Quarterly, 40(2), 101789.
