Pendekatan Kontekstual dalam Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Bangun Ruang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30742/tpd.v1i02.858Keywords:
Contextual approach, conceptual understanding, solid figure.Abstract
This study aims to improve student mathematics learning outcomes on the topic of solid figure through the implementation of contextual approach. This research is a classroom action research (CAR) conducted in class VI B SDN 139 / V PKMT Taman Raja. Subjects in this study were 29 students. Students have difficulty in the process of abstraction of mathematical concepts and tend to be less motivated to learn. In applying the contextual approach, students are given problems that are often encountered in everyday life and collaborative learning. The results showed that students experienced an increase in mastery of concepts as indicated by an increase in the average score of 21.61 in the pre cycle, 57.47 in the first cycle, and 79.77 in the second cycle.References
Afandi, M. (2014). Pentingnya Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Bagi Guru dalam Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1), 1–19. Anggo, M. (2011). Pemecahan masalah matematika kontekstual untuk meningkatkan kemampuan metakognisi siswa. Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. Bernard, M. (2015). Meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi dan penalaran serta disposisi matematik siswa SMK dengan pendekatan kontekstual melalui game adobe flash cs 4.0. Infinity Journal, 4(2), 197–222. Berns, R. G., & Erickson, P. M. (2001). Contextual Teaching and Learning: Preparing Students for the New Economy. The Highlight Zone: Research@ Work No. 5. Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics- Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020119. Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2010). A conceptual approach to physics problem solving. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1289, 137–140. AIP. Faqih, N. (2019). Peningkatan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pembelajaran IPA Materi Gerak Benda Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik. Trapsila: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 1(01), 8–18. Hegde, B., & Meera, B. N. (2012). How do they solve it? An insight into the learner’s approach to the mechanism of physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(1), 010109. Kasri, K. (2018). Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar Matematika melalui Media Puzzle Siswa Kelas I SD. Jurnal Pendidikan: Riset dan Konseptual, 2(3), 320–325. Kastiniwati, K. (2019). Peningkatan Aktivitas Hasil Belajar Kognitif Materi Penjumlahan dan Pengurangan Melalui Media Konkret. Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual, 4(3), 274–281. Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2013). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer Science & Business Media. Maloney, D. P. (1994). Research on problem solving: Physics. Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, 327–354. Mulhamah, Susilahudin Putrawangsa. (2016). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kontekstual dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Volume 10 No.1 Januari 2016, 59-80. Nuryasana, E. (2019). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share (TPS) dan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Trapsila: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 1(01), 72–80. Owens, T. (2001). Teacher Preparation for Contextual Teaching and Learning A Statewide Consortium Model. Portland, Oregon. Prinotama, A. N., Larasati, D. A., & Roosyanti, A. (2019). Pengaruh Joyfull Learning terhadap Motivasi Belajar di SDN Karah I Surabaya. Trapsila: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 1(01), 96– 105. Pujayastri, A. (2018). Model Remated (Realistic Mathematic Education): MeningkatKan Hasil Belajar Matematika Materi Pengukuran. Jurnal Pendidikan: Riset dan Konseptual, 2(2), 189– 195. Pujiati, P. (2017). Penerapan Metode Smart Games dalam Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Operasi Bilangan Bulat pada Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan: Riset dan Konseptual, 1(1), 120– 125. Rahmadani, A. (2019). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TGT (Team Games Tournament) pada Pokok Bahasan Pecahan Sederhana Kelas III SDN Tanjungsari 1 Sidoarjo. Trapsila: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 1(01), 55–71. Rahmawati, F. (2013). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pendidikan Realistik Matematika dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Prosiding SEMIRATA 2013, 1(1). Rosmaiyadi, R., Mariyam, M., & Juliyanti, J. (2018). Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Dengan Strategi Pembelajaran Group To Gruop Exchange Berpendekatan Kontekstual. JPPM (Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 11(1). Ryan, Q. X., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., & Mason, A. (2016). Computer problem-solving coaches for introductory physics: Design and usability studies. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010105. Sajadi, M., Amiripour, P., & Rostamy- Malkhalifeh, M. (2013). The examining mathematical word problems solving ability under efficient representation aspect. Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 2013, 1–11. Saputra, Y. D. (2017). Penerapan Strategi I-Care berbantuan EModul untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Lengkung. Jurnal Pendidikan: Riset dan Konseptual, 1(1), 38–44. Sariningsih, R. (2014). Pendekatan kontekstual untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman matematis siswa SMP. Infinity Journal, 3(2), 150–163. Soong, B., Mercer, N., & Er, S. S. (2009). Students’ difficulties when solving physics problems: Results from an ICT-infused revision intervention. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE), 361–365. Subaedah, (2016), Implementasi Pendekatan Konstruktivistik pada Pembelajaran Sains di SMP Negeri 34 Makassar Sulawesi Selatan, Jurnal Administrasi Publik Vol 6 No. 1, 88-95 Suherman, E. (2006). Pendekatan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran matematika. Educare, 2(1). Tambelu, J. V. (2013). Development of mathematical learning based contextual model in south minahasa regency. Development, 4(15). Taqwa, M. R. A. (2017). Profil pemahaman konsep mahasiswa dalam menentukan arah resultan gaya. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, 79– 87. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Taqwa, M. R. A. (2018). Kekeliruan Memahami Konsep Gaya, Apakah Pasti Miskonsepsi? Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Integrasinya, 1(02), 1–12. Taqwa, M. R. A., Astalini, & Darmaji. (2015). Hubungan Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Dinamika Rotasi dan Kesetimbangan Benda Tegar Kelas XI IPA SMA Se-Kota Jambi. 220–227. Purworejo: Universitas Purworejo.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Trapsila Journal and Research Institutions and Community Service, Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, University of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya as publisher of the journal.
