Social Reconciliation Strategy and the Impact of Political Polarization in Jatilengger Village Post-Village Head Election

Abstract

This study aims to examine the process of reconciliation following the village head election in Jatilengger Village and its impact on the community’s social cohesion. The research adopts a descriptive qualitative approach. Data sources were obtained from community leaders, village officials, and residents from both sides of the competing village head candidates. Data collection techniques included direct field observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation of various social activities conducted after the election. Data analysis employed the interactive model developed by Miles and Huberman, consisting of three key components: data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. Data reduction was carried out by selecting and simplifying essential information from interviews and observations. The data were then presented in descriptive narrative form to reveal recurring social patterns. Conclusion drawing was conducted continuously throughout the research process to ensure the validity and consistency of the findings. The results indicate that the reconciliation process occurred informally through the active involvement of local leaders and the implementation of strategies rooted in local values, such as community discussions, collective work, religious gatherings, and Independence Day celebrations. Although emotional wounds and traces of political fanaticism remained, the reconciliation efforts effectively restored social relationships and strengthened the village’s social cohesion. These findings highlight the significant role of local socio-cultural values in maintaining democratic sustainability at the village level.