DINAMIKA KELAS MENENGAH, KESALEHAN, DAN PERAN GENDER DALAM PRODUK KALIGRAFI: STUDI KASUS INDUSTRI KALIGRAFI ERGO DI YOGYAKARTA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30742/juispol.v6i1.5042Keywords:
calligraphy, religious_habitus, symbolic_capital, distinction, feminismAbstract
This study analyzes the phenomenon of calligraphy consumption as a form of religious product among middle-class Muslim women, focusing on Ergo, a calligraphy industry based in Yogyakarta. Using Pierre Bourdieu’s theoretical framework—particularly the concepts of habitus, field, and various forms of capital (economic, cultural, and symbolic), along with distinction—this research seeks to understand how the aesthetic and religious consumption practices of calligraphy reflect the social, gendered, and class dynamics of contemporary urban Muslim society. The findings reveal that calligraphy functions not merely as a decorative element but also as a symbol of piety, social status, and religious identity within the family. Women play a dominant role in decision-making regarding the purchase, design, and arrangement of calligraphy in domestic spaces. Through their preference for minimalist and elegant designs, middle-class women convert economic capital into symbolic capital, reinforcing the family’s religious image and social respectability. In this process, a gendered habitus emerges—where the domestic sphere becomes a field in which women negotiate their agency and identity. However, this practice also displays a certain ambivalence. On one hand, women utilize domestic space to assert their agency and performativity of gender; on the other, they simultaneously reproduce patriarchal structures through subtle forms of symbolic violence, which naturalize women’s roles as guardians of home aesthetics and morality. Thus, the consumption of calligraphy among middle-class Muslim women can be understood as a social practice that intertwines religiosity, aesthetics, and social status—reflecting the complex interaction between religious habitus, symbolic capital, and practices of distinction within Indonesia’s Muslim middle-class culture.
References
Abu-Lughod, L. (1998). Feminist longings and postcolonial conditions. In L. Abu-Lughod (Ed.), Remaking women: Feminism and modernity in the Middle East (pp. 3–32). Princeton University Press.
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691007163/remaking-women
Aeni, N., & Nuriyanto, L. K. (2020). Religiusitas kelas menengah Muslim Surakarta: Interaksi dengan globalisasi dan modernitas. Harmoni, 19(2), 232–251.
https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v19i2.450
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination. Stanford University Press.
https://monoskop.org/images/8/88/Bourdieu_Pierre_Masculine_Domination_2001.pdf
Brenner, S. (1996). Reconstructing self and society: Javanese Muslim women and “the veil.” American Ethnologist, 23(4), 673–697.
https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1996.23.4.02a00010
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
https://selforganizedseminar.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/butler-gender_trouble.pdf
Deeb, L. (2006). An enchanted modern: Gender and public piety in Shi‘i Lebanon. Princeton University Press.
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691124211/an-enchanted-modern
Fealy, G., & White, S. (Eds.). (2008). Expressing Islam: Religious life and politics in Indonesia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Göle, N. (2017). Islam and secularity: The future of Europe’s public sphere. Duke University Press.
https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/2357/Islam-and-Secularity
Hasbullah, M. (2014). Cultural presentation of the Muslim middle class in contemporary Indonesia. Studia Islamika, 7(2).
https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v7i2.708
Heryanto, A. (2015). Identity and pleasure: The politics of Indonesian screen culture. NUS Press.
https://www.nuspress.nus.edu.sg/products/identity-and-pleasure
Hoesterey, J. B. (2016). Rebranding Islam: Piety, prosperity, and a self-help guru. Stanford University Press.
Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press.
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691127878/politics-of-piety
Miller, D. (2008). The comfort of things. Polity Press.
https://is.muni.cz/el/1423/podzim2013/SOC583/um/The_Comfort_of_Things.pdf
Rahman, T. (2021). Ruang dan identitas sosial: Reproduksi identitas kelas menengah Muslim di Pesantren Ar Risalah Padang. Jurnal Sosiologi Andalas, 15(2), 145–160.
Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
https://teddykw2.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/visual-methodologies.pdf
Salim, M. P. K. (n.d.). Islamic art and feminism: Redefining narratives in contemporary women’s art.
https://www.academia.edu/123799795/
Sandıkcı, Ö., & Ger, G. (2010). Veiling in style: How does a stigmatized practice become fashionable? Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1), 15–36.
https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article/37/1/15/1799325
Sehlikoglu, S. (2018). Revisited: Muslim women’s agency and feminist anthropology of the Middle East. Contemporary Islam, 12(1), 73–92.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-017-0404-8
Stevens, L. (2007). A space of one’s own: Women’s magazine consumption within family life. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(1), 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.219
Watenpaugh, H. (2013). Art and architecture in women and Islamic cultures: Disciplinary paradigms and approaches.


