PERAN MEDIASI KAPASITAS ADAPTIF DALAM DAMPAK RISIKO LINGKUNGAN DAN INSTITUSIONAL TERHADAP KETAHANAN MATA PENCAHARIAN PETANI
The Mediating Role of Adaptive Capacity in The Impact of Environmental and Institutional Risks on Livelihood Resilience of Farmers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30742/jisa25220255022Abstract
Petani menghadapi risiko lingkungan, ekonomi, dan institusional yang mengancam penghidupan dan meningkatkan kerentanan terhadap kemiskinan serta kerawanan pangan. Penelitian ini mengkaji risiko-risiko tersebut dan mengevaluasi kapasitas adaptif petani dalam mengelolanya. Studi menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan survei dan wawancara terhadap 372 responden petani di Kabupaten Luwu, Sulawesi Selatan, yang dipilih melalui stratified random sampling. Data dianalisis menggunakan Structural Equation Model-Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). Hasil menunjukkan bahwa risiko lingkungan (β = –0.632) dan institusional (β = –0.366) secara signifikan mengurangi kapasitas adaptif, sementara risiko ekonomi tidak berpengaruh signifikan. Kapasitas adaptif secara signifikan meningkatkan ketahanan penghidupan (β = 0.921) dan memediasi pengaruh risiko lingkungan dan institusional. Model ini menjelaskan 74,0% varians kapasitas adaptif dan 83,4% varians ketahanan penghidupan. Temuan menyoroti peran kritis kapasitas adaptif dan menekankan pentingnya mengurangi risiko lingkungan serta institusional sambil memperkuat kapasitas adaptif untuk mendukung penghidupan pertanian berkelanjutan. Rekomendasi mencakup pertanian cerdas iklim, pengelolaan lahan berkelanjutan, dan kebijakan yang mendukung.
Kata kunci: Keberlanjutan Pertanian, Pertanian Cerdas Iklim, Risiko Ekonomi, Risiko Kelembagaan, Risiko Lingkungan.
Farmers face environmental, economic, and institutional risks that threaten their livelihoods and increase vulnerability to poverty and food insecurity. This study examines these risks and evaluates farmers' adaptive capacity in managing them. The study used quantitative methods with surveys and interviews with 372 farmer respondents in Luwu Regency, South Sulawesi, selected through stratified random sampling. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Model-Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The results show that environmental (β = –0.632) and institutional (β = –0.366) risks significantly reduce adaptive capacity, while economic risks have no significant effect. Adaptive capacity significantly increases livelihood resilience (β = 0.921) and mediates the effects of environmental and institutional risks. The model explains 74.0% of the variance in adaptive capacity and 83.4% of the variance in livelihood resilience. The findings highlight the critical role of adaptive capacity and emphasize the importance of reducing environmental and institutional risks while strengthening adaptive capacity to support sustainable agricultural livelihoods. Recommendations include climate-smart agriculture, sustainable land management, and supportive policies.
Keywords: Environmental risk; Economic risk; Institutional risk; Sustainable agriculture; Climate-smart agriculture.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Putra Astaman, Aulia Nurul Hikmah, Muhammad Dassir, Dita Rosyita, Intan Mega Maharani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- The author retains copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication with the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows others to share the work with acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may make additional separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published journal version of the work (for example, posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during the submission process, as it can result in a productive exchange, as well as earlier and larger citations of published work (See The Influence Open Access).
